The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments (self-close per WP:NACD) (non-admin closure) czar  03:15, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boaz Huss[edit]

Boaz Huss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currently fails all registers of WP:SCHOLAR notability, PROD removed czar  16:26, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. czar  16:26, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. czar  16:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Having a few articles with single-digit citations each (most influential: 22) usually doesn't count as being cited "widely", but I don't have a frame of reference for the field. I'll take a look at the refs added later tonight. czar  00:19, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.