The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:25, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bloomfield Park[edit]

Bloomfield Park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

As this doesn't exist (yet), this appears to be a bit of a WP:CRYSTAL violation, and is written rather promotionally besides. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete without prejudice against recreation - This can be rewritten by someone uninvolved with the project in a more neutral and less predictive manner if it is truly notable. There are references, but this is such a biased start I think a clean slate would be better. Chillum 02:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:32, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, with possibility of being re-created if the place is ever finished, and in a more neutral tone at that. I don't think there is any need for an article about something that doesn't yet exist. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 17:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.