The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Now referenced and asserts notability seicer | talk | contribs 16:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Birmingham Steel Corporation[edit]

Birmingham Steel Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable company? Fails to assert any notability. SGGH ^speak! 00:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. --Eastmain (talk) 00:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I added some references. --Eastmain (talk) 00:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Eastmain's refs. Hard for a steel corp to be small enough to be non-notable.John Z (talk) 03:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - a Verfiable stub providing history & background. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 04:21, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - now referenced. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 00:51, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.