The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Kedian[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable outside of the events of his unfortunate death. See WP:BIO1E. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As a serving soldier killed on duty, he is only notable for that one event, therefore failing WP:BIO1E. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Cwmhiraeth, Jonesey95. Smmurphy^(Talk) 17:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sad but not notable, per WP:Memorial. Kierzek (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to deletion. Fergananim (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a soldier who gets killed is not default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Concur with nominator & Kierzek. Finnegas (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Getting killed is not enough to make you notable. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.