The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 22:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, another non-notable candidate who meets neither WP:BIO nor WP:C&E. Vectro 01:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Propaganda for hopeful politician.--Húsönd 01:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete now, but allow it to be recreated if he's elected. RedRollerskate 02:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 05:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Rewrite He is a notable person with 32,000 google hits. he has no chance to win but someone should rewrite the article. Electricbassguy 20:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Madchen Hoch 22:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all articles about major-party candidates for Congress or other offices of that significance. JamesMLanetc 09:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per JamesMLane. C&E is neither policy nor guideline. It is a proposal. It is a misguided proposal. He is notable as a major party candidate — not a garage band — so we not focus on self-promotion questions here. Any potential POV issues are vanilla, and should be dealt with as usual, through editing. We can spare the 1K this takes. Fishboy 10:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.