The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bhagyari[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. No references and seems only to be mentioned on dogbreedinfo.com, a WP:SPS. Not recognised as a "breed" by any Kennel Clubs. SagaciousPhil - Chat 09:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is high time we deleted all articles lacking any source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, a simple Google search would seem to indicate that this is a real breed. I expect that there are sources, but that they are mostly in Urdu (which I don't speak). Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:22, 21 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]

WP:GNG requires reliable sources, so just finding sources in Google does not establish notability. I agree, it seems like a real breed, but there's no reliable info to base an article on. That's one of the purposes of Wikipedia's notability requirement. Agyle (talk) 18:53, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:06, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unable to find any reliable sources that mention either "bhagyari" (as dogs; it is a location) or "Pakistani shepherd dog". I didn't find it in any books, scholarly journals, or pop periodicals. Some websites contain information (1 2 3 4), and they are listed for sale on Pakistani websites (1 2), but these aren't reliable sources. Agyle (talk) 18:53, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.