The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. (non-admin closure). Yet another arm in the acrimony between MSJapan and Kvng. Kvng obviously wants this kept but nominated it for deletion on the premise that MSJapan wanted it deleted. MSJapan doesn't want it deleted. Nobody wants it deleted. There's no real case for deletion and a merger can be hashed out elsewhere. p b p 18:56, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bengay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

MSJapan has boldly redirected this to Johnson & Johnson#Products claiming WP:NOTPROMO, WP:NOTGUIDE. The article was prodded by CoatThese and I deprodded it and added evidence of notability on the article's talk page. WP:BRD has not so far worked to resolve this so I am bringing this here because I beleive it is MSJapan's desire that my deprod be reversed and the article be deleted. ~Kvng (talk) 16:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand, it is hard to find a history of it because there are so many Ghits for it. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 17:40, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and close as disruptive - This is a case of WP:POINT and WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Had I wanted to AfD this, I would have done so; I did not. It was redirected for lack of sources but clearly passing WP:V; not every product has an article on Wikipedia. AfDing an article with a rationale that amounts to a personal attack is not appropriate. MSJapan (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.