The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Cerebellum (talk) 00:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Belushin Law Firm[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing particularly notable about this law firm. What's the law-firm equivalent to the professor test? Whatever it is, there is nothing in the article that indicates notability. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A firm going about its business; no evidence that it meets the notability guidelines. AllyD (talk) 05:54, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:27, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:28, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:28, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I could find nothing to indicate this firm has any coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I couldn't find any coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG of WP:ORG. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing particularly notable about this law firm. MatsTheGreat (talk) 09:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.