The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:Tóraí per CSD G5, "Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban: per WP:DUCK". (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:09, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bebuzee[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately sourced article about a non-notable social network. I am unable to find any reliable sources with which to establish notability The article claims that the website has 2,000,000+ users, which seems dubious given its Alexa rank and the fact that the site was launched only two months ago. - Mr X 00:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:EVASION. Re-creation of paid promotional article from gigantic sockfarm of blocked editor [1] either by same person or a proxy. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:39, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.