The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 'Deleted Speedied under CSD:G5 Hasteur (talk) 15:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Baryo Hakshur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• WP:GNG - Not notable
• WP:SPAM/WP:PROMO - Created by confirmed sockpuppet of banned spammer: Voidz [1] PeterWesco (talk) 01:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. czar · · 04:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG; trivial media presence except self-promotion and minor event announcements.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I have no opinion here (so far), but please note that according to he:שיחה:בריו חקשור (the Hebrew Wikipedia's equivalent article's talk page), there has apparently been significant coverage of Hakshur (also spelled Chakshur) in Hebrew-language media. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 18:16, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I'm not in a position to parse those sources from the Hebrew Wikipedia... could someone post links here? UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 16:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Gladly. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 18:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Baryo Chakshur–related articles at chasidinews.com
  2. (The second link given there is dead)
  3. Baryo Chakshur–related articles at bhol.co.il

OK, thank you! That first link looks like a blog, how is it as far as reliability goes? The third link is to a page of search results - if some article from there is being cited for some fact here, we should do that more precisely. But as a source the site looks OK generally. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 14:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.