The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The general conclusion is that this insult / social phenomenon is not sufficiently notable. Deryck C. 17:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bajingan[edit]

Bajingan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTDICT. This relatively obscure Javanese word shows little coverage in reliable sources, and is likely impossible to expand beyond the dictionary defintion of how the term is used (regardless of its pejorative connotations). —0xF8E8 (talk) 19:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 21:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 21:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Uanfala: your link to Google Scholar returns a 403 error when I click on it. Could you provide a citation of the work you have in mind? Cnilep (talk) 08:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, here's the citation:
Ashari, L., 2003. Power Sharing Between the Kyai, Bajingan and the Village Head. Mimeo. World Bank Office Jakarta. Uanfala (talk) 09:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  20:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As the sources currently stand, it would be better covered in an article on Indonesian social classes. I agree a fuller examination of the Indonesian sources is necessary. My main concern right now is that this entry doesn't seem like it's going to be anything more than a dictionary definition, but coverage in Indonesian sources may convince me otherwise. I tried pasting some of the Scholar titles into Google Translate to get an idea of what they're covering, but it largely came out a jumbled mess. For now, I guess we'll have to wait until an Indonesian speaker comes along. —0xF8E8 (talk) 00:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think the social class definition still fails WP:SIGCOV. Incidentally I can't find it on the World Bank website. Incidentally 2: the Indonesian Wikipedia Bajingan article is mostly about oxcart drivers. All in all I still vote for delete, as above. Davidelit (Talk) 01:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.