The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close, nom withdrawn, non-admin close. Panoptical 01:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BadVista[edit]

BadVista (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article is really so short, it should be integrated into the Free Software Foundation's page. All it is is a sentence and 2 pictures. Panoptical 22:26, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, just a NN stunt. Fails WP:N and WP:RS. meshach 01:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, two seconds on google.... and google suggests to me BadVista instead... which is far less likely to turn up non-related results. And even so, turns up hundreds of thousands. [1] All of this suggesting to me, we should indeed keep it. An example of one of the many references [2] from zdnet. Mathmo ^Talk 04:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep, received attention from multiples sources. [3] [4]

[5] [6] [7] Carlosguitar 06:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, notable campaign. JIP | Talk 07:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Laudable campaign, but in a global, historical context, not notable. Gronky 19:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Global and historical context" are not criterion of WP:ORG. This campaign is notable because was publisher by reliable secondary sources. Carlosguitar 21:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Seems to pass notability to me. Plenty blogs, some press. 172.203.199.18 20:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• WITHDRAW I was really suggesting merge/redirect, as suggested by nom, but now that more info has been provided, its worthy of a stub. Panoptical 01:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.