The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If a list article is created and someone wishes to merge, feel free to let me know. Coredesat 03:34, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BNSF 7687[edit]

BNSF 7687 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Contested prod. A non notable locomotive.

Also including BNSF 7695 Nuttah68 16:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or Merge and redirect to an UNLINKED list article, maybe List of BNSF locomotives. These and other non-notable locomotives could be merged to a list article per WP:LIST guidelines and Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Merging instructions; that is often how such items are handled. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 17:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Ack. Not a notable locomotive. There's no need to redirect it. I don't see enough people searching for the term to warrant it. i (talk) 19:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, NN locomotive. Wikipedia is not a directory of rolling stock. There are plenty of railfan websites for this material (though I have no idea if any are wikis, which would be useful). --Dhartung | Talk 21:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:N. Doctorfluffy 23:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note - user indefinitely blocked as disruptive sockpuppet. — xDanielx ^T/_C 22:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment notification left on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains. Slambo (Speak) 23:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; I'm strongly inclined (even as a railfan) to agree with Dhartung above, and I'll add that these days the barriers to starting your own wiki are very low. If there needs to be a wiki to cover this material, one or more of the railfan Web sites should start one. --Tkynerd 00:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: There is a fledgling Wiki -- TrainSpotting World -- but even there I wouldn't expect to see sub-stub articles on non-heritage diesels.
    EdJogg 23:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and Redirect according to Jayron32's proposal. ----DanTD 05:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as per above EdJogg 23:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and Redirect per Jayron32's proposal above. --Oakshade 23:27, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The only assertion of notability is the color scheme used to paint the locomotives. If there's something to say about BNSF color schemes, it should probably be mentioned elsewhere. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 19:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.