The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Already speedily deleted.. Sandstein 10:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BJMB[edit]

BJMB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable acronym or neologism of a construction technique. Page seems a subtle attempt by a Chinese manufacturing company to promote its construction methods. Page creator is clearly linked to LF-BJMB (see http://www.cnxzlf.com/about-us/company-profile.html), and has not declared COI or PAID. Whilst there may be some detailed content which, if referenced, could be added to Space Frame, I urge against any WP:REDIRECT which leaves a promotional name/acronym in place unless it can be shown to be a legitimate one in broad use, which I do not believe this one is, based on a Google search for the term. (Pinging Kudpung who initially CSDed this for copyvio reasons.) Nick Moyes (talk) 09:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• delete veiled WP:artspam. Lacks WP:RS. Possibly WP:CSD#A11--Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as non-notable and promotional. Searching for the phrase behind the acronym gets seven GHits, five of which are on alibaba and one of which is us. Mangoe (talk) 14:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as spam. It's as blatant as it's veiled. The CSD tag was removed by the now blocked author. The tag should have been restored and we would have been done with it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Meh. someone might want to check and see if it still has copyvio's. I was not able to do so.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Checked, found, and speedied g11 & g12. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:56, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, per above, WP:NOTPROMOTION. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.