The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, move to bNet. Singularity 00:19, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B.net[edit]

B.net (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete No significant coverage in secondary or third party reliable source. Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, and but move to bNet.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 00:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, way notable in NZ. Vegetationlife (talk) 19:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Reliable sources exist, notable. Soxred93 | talk bot 20:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.