The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as speedy A7 and protected from being recreated - Peripitus (Talk) 12:12, 8 May 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Azhar Sabri[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only sources given are press releases. Does not meet WP:GNG, although I'm not tagging for A7 because there does seem to be a claim to notability, albeit a weak one. Note that the article was tagged for A7 while I was nominating it, so should the article be speedily deleted, please close this AfD. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. There is no independent coverage of the subject. Also no basis for notability is stated. Even though this article was written today (8 May), I can find no basis to think that it can be improved to meet guidelines. --Bejnar (talk) 07:24, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per nom. Subject would qualify under CSD:A7 (biography) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 09:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.