The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Seems unnotable, only 1 google hit (rest on his name are a different person). Russeasby 19:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak conditional keep. I had nominated this for CSD before, but I think there is a horribly weak notability claim since he's on some wealthiest person list and is involved with philanthopy, etc. I won't lose any sleep over it getting deleted though. As such, the article is unreferenced and the claim needs to be checked out for validity and there should probably be more assertion of notability. The serial removal of the unref and CSD tags isn't helping either. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 19:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For what its worth, last years version of this list is here on WP Sunday_Times_Rich_List_2006, 2007 one is not published for a few more days. But note how many on this do not have articles, the ones that do primarily seem to have them due to notability for something other then happening to be on this list. Russeasby 20:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Russeasby. -- Jeff3000 20:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:V with no sources whatsoever and nevermind no secondary sources showing notability. Bridgeplayer 20:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.