The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ayzad[edit]

Article fails WP:BIO, WP:N. There are no sources and the only external link is to the author's website of dubious quality. Millbrooky (talk) 03:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - Per nom. Asenine 08:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete, subject lacks notability - Dumelow (talk) 16:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. Fails every Wikipedia policy regarding Italian sadomasochistic bondage that I'm aware of. Also fails WP:RS, WP:BIO, and WP:BK, in case anybody is interested in those policies as well. Qworty (talk) 03:20, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep There isn't much material even for a stub, but such a person would have a decent article were they only to be American. --Simon Speed (talk) 10:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per consensus. I disagree with Simon Speed: the nationality of the author is not a factor in my decision in this case, nor should it be. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 18:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.