The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. --Core desat 07:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Naval Cadet Traning Ship Norfolk[edit]

Article is about a group of Australian Navy Cadets. In Australia, cadet organisations are on about the same level as Scouting, and individual groups/squardrons/training ships have the same level of unproven notability as a random scout troop. None of the information presented is externally verified through the use of third party sources, and I don't think it would be externally verifiable

On a side note, I have no qualms about any useful, externally verifiable information being smerged to Australian Navy Cadets, as while I believe the whole organisation is notable and verifiable, individual units aren't. -- saberwyn

I am also nominating the following related pages, for the same reason as above:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- -- saberwyn 10:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "Training" is spelt incorrectly in the title, by the way. --Canley 12:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Maybe "traning" is like "aluminium," "encyclopaedia," "dreamt," or "pyjamas."Edison 22:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete though a merge to Wellington Point State High School (I don't know if it exists under some other name, but it might), would not be too anathemal to me. FrozenPurpleCube 15:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per WP:ORG. It looks like it's going to be about a ship, but it isn't. --Dhartung | Talk 21:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Was thinking keep if it actually was an RAN ship, but looks like training "ships" don't have to be actual ships. From what I've seen, nominator is correct, these seem to be just cadet groups. --Canley 21:48, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Shore establishments of Naval organisations are often referred to as Stone frigates - there is no intention to deceive here, but the language "a training ship unit" is misleading. Springnuts 22:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable - which is a shame, I really wanted them to be notable, but they aren't. Springnuts 22:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Australian Navy Cadets. Unverifiable and no attempt at showing notability as an individual organisation. Ga rr ie 00:23, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If Training Ship is misleading, try HMAS Nirimba, which is now a TAFE college - it's about 30km inland in Quakers Hill.Ga rr ie 00:23, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Her Majesty's Australian Shore Nirimba was the former Naval Aviation base, like HMAS Albatross (air station). -- saberwyn 20:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and repeat, very little indication of notability. Seraphimblade 01:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If this was an actual naval ship, I would support keeping. Given that it is a cadets unit, deletion on the grounds of notability is appropriate. Capitalistroadster 01:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.