The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW applies as well as the arguments given below. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Muslim Party[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic of this article does not meet WP:ORG. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 17:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 17:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 17:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable organisation. It has no registration as a political party according the Australian Electoral Commission [1] and besides the media running off with their launch story has no other mentions. Aeonx (talk) 20:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not yet even amassed the relatively paltry amount of signatures to be registered for election. '''tAD''' (talk) 20:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this new political party got a flurry of publicity the day after it was founded last November, so it is sort of like WP:1E, it was founded, people noticed. But until it wins elections, or gains ongoing attention of some sort, it lacks notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-registered party that has yet to receive enough reliable outside coverage to pass WP:ORG or WP:GNG. No prejudice against re-creation/restoration if there is discernible increase in RS coverage.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 21:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, at least for now, as non-notable. VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, our usual standard is official registration somewhere, plus sustained media coverage that meets the WP:GNG. This party doesn't have either, yet. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, a case of WP:TOOSOON. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.