The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No agreement and minimal participation after two relists. RL0919 (talk) 04:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Football International[edit]

Australian Football International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guideline. Part of an ongoing cleanup campaign of conflict-of-interest editing in international Australian rules football articles. I'm AfDing this rather than PRODing because a couple of sources mention the organisation - however, these mentions are not substantial and the articles focus on the sport of Footy 9s rather than the organisation behind it. – Teratix ₵ 04:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 04:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 04:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep: While there has been COI and promotional editing, I have added some sources that I think demonstrate the organisation does meet WP:GNG and the article can hopefully be further improved from here. Possibly some of the multiple articles created by this editor should be merged/re-directed? Melcous (talk) 01:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• @Melcous: thanks for adding more sources, but none of them give the organisation more than a passing mention. – Teratix ₵ 06:07, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.