The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Number 5 7 16:15, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Chamber of Commerce in Paraguay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. looks an important organization but gets not one GHIT in Australia, seems like no one in Australia actually notices this organization "No results found for "Australian Chamber of Commerce in Paraguay " site:.au. " 6 of the 8 sources merely confirm the death of their former president. So these 6 sources are not even about the chamber itself LibStar (talk) 13:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paraguay-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Given that official statistics state that there is virtually no trade between Australia and Paraguay (only $A2.8 million in 2012-13) this organisation is highly unlikely to be notable. Paraguay is apparently Australia's 171st most important trade partner... Nick-D (talk) 08:45, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment On seeing this deletion request I assumed this would have a history because of New Australia, but according to the article itself this is a new organisation. As an inclusionist, I'm not recommending deletion, but it doesn't look like it has "runs on the board" to actually have notability, yet. Mark Hurd (talk) 10:20, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.