The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:54, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AuronPlay[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

insufficeint reliable information to show notability of this youtuber DGG ( talk ) 23:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there's zero allegation of notability. This page would have to be extensively edited just to be a stub. By all appearances, this is run of the mill, one of tens of thousands of YouTubers. This was probably created by a fan in good faith, but it may be a case of too soon for inclusion. Ping me if you can find real coverage. Bearian (talk) 15:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Failed to find evidence of significant notability. Graywalls (talk) 20:26, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. nothing found on google, i didn't see any WP:RS. fail's WP:GNG.-Nahal^(T) 22:55, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.