The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Augusto Orrel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (books) requirement. The refs here seem to be primary sources (up to and including Facebook) and mentions in passing. There are two reviews on "http://www.zam.it/" but that site doesn't look very reliable (through I'd appreciate comments from Italian editors). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:22, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: "Andrew Mangham" is the common blurb for all of these "Lerro fan" articles. (This one's a book from 2008.) Whatever value the poet/novelist/aphorist/historian has in Italian, he doesn't have a Wikipedia page at the Italian language Wikipedia. The references for notability provided for all of these works either show up as somewhat related to the purported publisher or to a very small group of individuals. There doesn't appear to be any independent, reliable press notice of this juggernaut. I accuse no one of anything, but these articles don't pass notability. Hithladaeus (talk) 13:51, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I feel like we're playing whack-a-mole with this author. Every time I think we've finished with him, another book article turns up. Not only does the author himself not have a page in the Italian WP, a page on him was deleted from the French WP. [1]. All of the articles are by a group of SPAs. LaMona (talk) 22:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above and per my comments on the other AfDs. This book is not notable enough for an article, nor is the author himself from what I can see. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.