The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Attock Group cricket team[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Withdrawn As per last comment

WP:NOTE Played in two seasons, won one came last in the next and not played since. Single minor noteable event doesnt confer noteability. Amortias (T)(C) 10:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Oppose. Two seasons in the highest domestic level in a country where cricket is arguably the most popular sport is hardly "single" or "minor". Also, the team's success rate doesn't make any difference to its notability. The notability guidelines established by the cricket WikiProject hold that all teams that have played first-class cricket qualify as notable under WP:GNG and WP:N – I don't see why this particular article should be an exemption from those guidelines. IgnorantArmies 13:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Misunderstandng of where they played quite happy to withdraw in this case. Amortias (T)(C) 14:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.