The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:34, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Atheme[edit]

WP:N - Subject is not notable, does not meet WP:SOFT notability requirements.
WP:V - Article is not verifiable, no sources whatsoever, and the only external link is the project homepage.
WP:SOAP - Article reads very much like an advertisement for the software in question.
WP:COI - Article is edited in large part by Nenolod, who developed Atheme.

Delete cacophony ◄► 09:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I fully agree that this article is not notable. I just tried to clean it up... by the way, it's all lowercase, cacophony. --nenolod (talk) (edits) 11:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hi, as per WP:COI, you are not allowed to comment on this AfD. I advise any closing admins to keep this in mind, too. cacophony ◄► 20:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --81.178.14.141 11:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. --Jmax- 12:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per criterion G11 Will ^(talk) 13:12, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete weak delete. I'm on the borderline of if it passes WP:SOFT or not, disagree with WP:SOAP, but agree with WP:V and WP:COI Q ^{T C} 20:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.