The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No consensus despite being listed for two weeks, so no prejudice towards a speedy renomination. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:10, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious keep, although a stub now; clearly notable as one of Osama's "closest" mujahideen, the son of an extremely notable cleric, and the subject of news stories himself. Sherurcij(speaker for the dead) 20:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Notability is not inherited. There is no description in the article as it stands that denotes notability in this case. If some other sources can be found, my vote may change, but not as it exists now.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 04:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- I agree that being an advisor to OBL, the world's most dangerous terrorist, is sufficient to establish notability all by itself. Geo Swan (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.