- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:27, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Artenol[edit]
- Artenol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is written by one of the members of the magazine's staff, so there are no reliable independent sources. The magazine is brand new, so notability is a question. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs) 14:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Tentative keep -- here's additional coverage from PRI: link, plus the NYT and New Yorker sources already in the article. Not much to go on, but I think worth keeping to see if more coverage comes in. If not, renominate in about six months. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The New Yorker source is dated 1991, and is not relevant to notability. Unscintillating (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 21:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per very good sources found. However, before this article is kept, it needs a whole of editing. Userfy? Bearian (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Userfy on request. Fails WP:SUSTAINED. The few sources are from the time of the debut of the magazine in Summer 2015, an event which as an event fails WP:NOTNEWS. Unscintillating (talk) 21:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.