The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Stifle (talk) 11:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aria Maestosa[edit]

Aria Maestosa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software would appear to fall under WP:NPRODUCT. Regardless of that or GNG, it doesn't appear to satisfy notability. Can't find any reliable/independent source that covers it with more than a couple of lines Nosebagbear (talk) 14:05, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:05, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:05, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So I spent a long time looking over that first source, and given its lack of an about page, the thing that swung it (though It'd still be a sole source) as unreliable is that its contact page reads "If you have advice, critics, collaboration proposals or if you want simply tell me Hi!" (my stress) - so there can't be much in the way of editorial control and review going on Nosebagbear (talk) 18:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.