The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete & redirect, lack of content to merge. >Radiant< 12:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aqualand el Arenal[edit]

Aqualand el Arenal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

I already sent the parent organization's article, Aqualand, to AfD. There's enough lag that I'm giving this article its own due process. Non-notable water park, no secondary sources cited. —C.Fred (talk) 23:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It's a water park. Need I say more? YechielMan 23:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete While I think the chain is notable, I don't think the individual parks are. JulesH 10:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Aqualand, which could use the content. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 14:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Aqualand. John Vandenberg 13:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 23:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.