The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - I'm not sure about this one, if the artist is notable wouldn't the article be worth keeping? Sources indicating notability might well exist for an independently notable artist. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 06:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Merge. No in-depth coverage to indicate notability, and reaching only No. 139 in the charts pretty much confirms the lack of notability. --DAJF (talk) 11:42, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Our licence does not allow merging without preserving the history, so delete/merge is not a possible outcome. Merging and then redirecting is possible. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:29, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clarification I didn't mean both and I'd tend to assume DAJF didn't either. I've altered my !vote so nobody else misunderstands. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 07:47, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect and comment - I merged the article and redirect to it's namesake. See edit heresmooth0707 (talk) 14:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.