The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Language Arts Crew. Remember that "delete and merge" can not be done as that makes merged content copyvio; merge, then redirect. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Applied Knowledge[edit]

Applied Knowledge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little to no quality coverage for this album, and Allmusic really isn't much of a source. Delete and merge to Language Arts Crew. SarahStierch (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom. Theopolisme 21:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete/merge — Applied Knowledge appears to fall just short of satisfying WP:NALBUM. A Google search brings up several relevant results, but virtually none of them are reliable sources. I think this album would be better covered in its entirety on the band's article. Kurtis (talk) 01:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.