The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bduke (talk) 09:58, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aotea College 1st XI (Football)[edit]

Aotea College 1st XI (Football) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

About as non-notable as it gets. If there are reliable sources for anything relating to the team, it can be mentioned in the article on the college. dramatic (talk) 06:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -dramatic (talk) 06:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:N, the creator of the article has linked all his team mates to disambig pages to eradicate redlinks but none of these players are notable enough ——Ryan | t • c 06:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 07:10, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as non-notable sports team.-gadfium 08:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No claim to notability whatsoever. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - clearly non-notable. GiantSnowman 15:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per all the above. A long, long way from meeting our notability standards. - fchd (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.