The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 03:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Taylor (boxer)[edit]

Anthony Taylor (boxer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOX. The WBU is nowhere close to a world-class organization. He has done nothing else. Charlie the Pig (talk) 04:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 05:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 05:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 05:33, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete As per nominator - does not come close to passing WP:NBOX.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The WBU is a minor organization. Fails NBOX and GNG since the coverage is just routine sports reporting.Mdtemp (talk) 15:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I don't believe he's achieved notability as a boxer or has the significant coverage required to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.