The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anopsology[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is on an obscure "raw food diet" without any reliable sources to establish notability. Therefore, it fails WP:GNG, while terribly suffering from WP:FRINGE. At best, this article should redirect to Raw food diet. Delta13C (talk) 13:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A strong early contender for 2016's "most egregious use of totally unreliable sources" award. Guy (Help!) 14:03, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or perhaps redirect as suggested. The sources are indeed not suitable to hold the article up - David Gerard (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I note, btw, that the articles in other languages aren't a lot better. The French version has references out to here, but my French is nowhere near good enough to assess if they could possibly prop this up as a notable fringe topic - David Gerard (talk) 10:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable bollocks. Alexbrn (talk) 22:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No hits on Google News or Google Scholar. The references are blogs and dead links. I find no evidence that this fringe theory has been covered in any RS. --Sammy1339 (talk) 21:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lack of reliable sources. I'd say if no valid medical claims, I'd hesitate to even redirect. Montanabw ^(talk) 06:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it true it is on the French government's 1999 List of cults and sects as Orkos? 81.187.223.119 (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(checking) Orkos is on the list [1] "Fédération internationale pour le développement de l'alimentation instinctive". Some kind of food based NRM, is it anopsology?81.187.223.119 (talk) 19:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And the French article is called 'Instinctothérapie' and explains that anopsology is another name for. I think if its on the French cult list it's notable as a new religious movement. 81.187.223.119 (talk) 19:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.