The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Angie Lau[edit]

Angie Lau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional BLP created by SPA. A WP:REFBOMB of non-RSes, primary sources and press releases. Literally the only independent third-party RS here is the three-paragraph article about Lau moving from WEWS to Bloomberg. Lau does not appear to meet any criterion of WP:JOURNALIST, nor WP:GNG. A WP:BEFORE shows no other RS coverage and hardly even any non-RS biographical coverage. PROD declined, but without any fixes. For this BLP to be kept, we would need clear independent third-party RS coverage demonstrating Wikipedia notability - is there any? David Gerard (talk) 17:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.