The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Complete bollocks & nonsense. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angel the Bullet[edit]

Angel the Bullet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article appears to either be a hoax or about someone who is not notable. Either way the reliable sources required to verify the information in the article do not appear to exist. Guest9999 (talk) 03:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy deletion clearly fits the criteria. Nonsense article. Chimeric Glider (talk) 04:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy deletion Clearly a hoax, nonsense article. Star Garnet (talk) 04:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.