The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:54, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anex:New Province of Ontario[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. The proposal this article refers to is notable, but this is just original research that seeks to describe what will happen if the proposal becomes reality. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:CRYSTAL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueboar (talk • contribs)

Delete - As a general rule, for topics that would strike most people as unlikely and stupid unless they saw proof, one should have citations to proof. Mandsford (talk) 18:39, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOR and WP:CRYSTAL. The geography, area, and population of the hypothetical province consisting of the rest of Ontario if the Greater Toronto Area seceded are not relevant to anything until the Province of Toronto becomes a serious proposal. However, Province of Toronto indicates that Toronto's secession from Ontario is not currently being debated seriously. I don't think we have similar articles for the "rest of" territories that would result if any of the various other secession proposals throughout the world were to take effect, nor do we need such articles. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An article created by a user who seems to want to push a POV throughout the encyclopaedia that Toronto should go independent. Non-encyclopaedic, completely soapboxy. Canterbury Tail talk 18:46, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per above. Joe Chill (talk) 19:49, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: this article cannot be brought in line with WP:OR. Ground Zero | t
Delete; WP:NOR violation. It isn't even a political proposal of any sort, but merely what would be left over after a different political proposal was implemented — and even that is, at this point, about as likely as pigs flying. And even if it did somehow magically happen tomorrow, there are still so many things wrong with this article that it still couldn't be the boilerplate for any of the changes that would actually need to be made to Ontario's article in that eventuality. Bearcat (talk) 07:28, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.