The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments czar ⨹ 03:44, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Sesinyi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced BLP article, too old to qualify for WP:BLPPROD. An author who is not wiki-notable, whose only book mentioned is also not notable. Ivanvector (talk) 22:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not-notable, fails WP:N and WP:GNG. BenLinus1214 (talk) 22:41, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've added a few sources with a quick google search. One book on Botswana literature mentions Sesinyi 28 separate times and goes in-depth on his writing style, philosophy and stories. I think this is a good example of Wikipedia's systemic bias against non-western topics. Keep and expand.--TM 01:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per TM. Mentioned here are one of the handful of important Batswana writers—Brigade Piron (talk) 15:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw - good finds, TM. These didn't come up for me when I Googled. The rationale for deletion has been resolved; I propose withdrawing the nomination. Ivanvector (talk) 16:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@BenLinus1214, do you withdraw your "delete" too? czar ⨹ 20:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw - Yes, it appears that the new sources have now made this article a viable stub. BenLinus1214 (talk) 03:31, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.