The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:09, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I decline a CSD because it possibly asserts some notability; bringing it to AfD. King of♥♦♣ ♠ 21:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. The information in the article is sourced and seems, if barely, notable. While I've never heard of him I am not an architect and the projects mentioned seem likely large enough to make him a figure inside his field. The article is in absolutely desperate need of cleanup, but the information is there in the sources for someone to be able to construct an actual article out of it.--Talain (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk) · @199 · 03:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.