The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Keating[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of coverage in independent, reliable sources. Current references are mostly interviews/blog posts. MapleSoy (talk) 19:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable writer. The sourcing is not of the quality to demonstrate actual notability by passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:35, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All the sources appear to be related, or otherwise unreliable. There does not appear to be much independent coverage of Andrew Keating at all. The relationship between Keating and former Thumbnail Press (now Cobalt Press) is unclear, but the photo prominent on the Thumbnail Press facebook page is by Andrew Keating. Regardless, the article fails to make a claim of notability for Keating, and the lack of significant independent coverage means Keating fails WP:GNG. --Bejnar (talk) 02:15, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.