The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 22:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andean Cat Alliance[edit]

Andean Cat Alliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are either press releases or broken links to what seem to be a directory listing. A WP:BEFORE only revealed passing mentions. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 06:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 06:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 06:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 06:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 06:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bolivia-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 06:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 06:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 06:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 06:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed up the dead links (there is a perfectly fine English version of their homepage, and WCN has various materials). - And no, being cited by the IUCN for the entire conservation program is not a bleedin' "passing mention". --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 06:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.