The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anarkismo.net[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic—a website—lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) There do not appear to be any sources that discuss the site itself ([1] is the closest) and most mentions are in passing from author bios. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ((ping)) me. czar 04:43, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. czar 04:43, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. czar 04:43, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 20:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. - TheMagnificentist 17:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- WP:ADVOCACY for an unremarkable web site. Note the ext links in body -- the hallmark of such promotional articles. This content belongs on the org's web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.