This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 07:55, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Anarchopedia and Anarchapedia[edit]

the site is full of grafitti and has only 140 articles (of varying quality). The current main page, for example, states "Christian Deck is a douche bag.". Non-notable, delete. RickK 23:26, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)

• Also Anarchapedia, which has only 1 article. Delete -- Curps 23:28, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --RoySmith 23:36, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• do not delete- anarchopedia is an example of what happens when there is no structure. i think that it's worth having an article and you shouldn't simply delete it because you dislike me. i will personally revert their main page if it hasn't been done yet. also, i am concerned that my article is being targeted because of the condalangus rice incident. i have decided that "condalangus rice" is not worthy of wikipedia and i will let it die. however, anarchopedia deserves an entry. there is a long article in anarchopedia about wikipedia. However, i have decided that anarchapedia (different site) is probably not worthy of an article at this point, and i vote that it should be deleted.potatoeman57-creator of the article
• Delete both. --Kelly Martin 01:06, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
• what if I remove the "christian deck" part? will that help? potatoeman57
• Delete, not notable, POV. Megan1967 02:01, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete both, non notable. JoaoRicardo 03:25, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete' Pointless. --Wetman 04:00, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete both. Website advertisements, no evidence of notability. Andrewa 05:20, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete them. Wyss 07:37, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Anarchopedia; this site links there anyway in some of the guidelines for making proper Wikipedia articles. Delete Anarchapedia - non-notable. --Idont Havaname 08:00, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: Can you be specific? Which guidelines link to Anarchopedia? No change of vote, not yet at least. Andrewa 12:09, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    • Look at Alternative outlets and What Wikipedia is not. Both pages mention Anarchopedia. --Idont Havaname 21:01, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
      • Comment: Thank you. Neither Wikipedia:Alternative outlets#Anarchopedia nor Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not an experiment in anarchy suggest to me that the Anarchopedia site is encyclopedic, and the Alexa rank below strongly suggests it isn't. I hope it does grow, but this is not the way to promote it. No change of vote. Andrewa 21:15, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete both, just 'cause they're fellow wikis doesn't make them encyclopedic. As far as I can tell, neither is of any serious importance. Anarchopedia has an Alexa rank of 3,889,432 (which is pretty pathetic, worse even than my personal site) and the other one has no Alexa rank at all! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:44, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. Despite its name, Wikipedia is not an online encyclopedia about other wikis. --Deathphoenix 03:57, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. Bacchiad 08:15, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable, as shown by Alexa rank of 3,889,432. Andris 23:28, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.