The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect; there is nothing notable about the separate seasons and while the search terms seem unlikely, they're not so implausible to be deleted. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American Association of Independent Professional Baseball 2009[edit]

I am also nominating the following related pages because [non-notable season pages]:

Not notable enough for separate season pages. I originally redirected it to American Association of Independent Professional Baseball but the creator reverted it, so I thought I'd see what the consensus is CTJF83Talk 22:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect all to American Association of Independent Professional Baseball per nom --mhking (talk) 01:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seasons are not notable.. No reason for redirect pages to exist. Spanneraol (talk) 01:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all Generally, individual seasons of sports leagues are considered notable enough for their own articles. (e.g., 2008 Premier Basketball League season, B.League 2008, Lao League 2008, etc.). There is a higher bar set for individual seasons of individual teams -- the 2008 Atlanta Braves season would merit its own page, the 2008 Rutland City Braves would not -- but we have a high tolerance for sports leagues. The topic selected by the 9-year old author is perfectly valid, and what these articles require is some instruction on how to compose informational tables. Mandsford (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and merge Seemingly no need to delete, redirect and merge.--Giants27 (t|c|r|s) 17:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Minor league. Merge. Bearian (talk) 18:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

* Speedy keep. Failure to follow WP:BEFORE before considering deletion. -- Biaswarrior (talk) 19:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser confirmed sock. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 19:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, Above users only edits have been to vote "Keep" on AfD's, and remove ProD's. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ged UK 19:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per SpannerAOL. Stifle (talk) 11:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Sources lacking...don't meet WP:N. BRMo (talk) 22:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to parent league article. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to American Association of Independent Professional Baseball. Kingturtle (talk) 02:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.