The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ambassador of Iceland to Tunisia[edit]

Ambassador of Iceland to Tunisia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. Iceland has never had a resident ambassador to Tunisia so creating an article about a non resident position that has done very little in Tunisia is hardly encyclopedic. Let's see if the usual suspect turns up to this AfD. Keep !voters must demonstrate actual coverage. LibStar (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not all diplomatic positions are notable.—azuki (talk · contribs · email) 07:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:02, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:02, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No useful Google hits, and this isn't even a stand-alone position so WP:N isn't met. According to the Icelandic government this is one of several roles held by the country's ambassador to France ([1]), so this could be redirected to the Ambassador of Iceland to France article. Nick-D (talk) 11:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- another contentless microstub in the endless "Ambassador of Country A to Country B" cookie-cutter series. Are we going to have 40,000 of these for every possible combination of the 200 nations of the world. These "articles" are an exercise in combinatorics, not encyclopedia building. Useless. Reyk _YO! 19:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as still questionable for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 05:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.