The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as an attack page (CSD G10) and/or a hoax. Google gives no evidence that a wrestler by this name (or by any of the given stage names) even exists. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 21:09, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alyssa Ortiz[edit]

Alyssa Ortiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Cross-reference Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North All-Time Wrestling for related delete. No reliable sources, no notability if her activity has only taken place in non-notable (and non-verifiable) organizations. Deltopia 12:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a page at wikiquotes as well, which lists no references. Vidioman 13:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Oppose - needs a prose-overhaul, if it doesn't happen bring it back to AFD and I would support a delete. Onnaghar ^{talk ! ctrb} 16:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry - I wasn't nominating it because it was poorly-written; I was nominating it because it is entirely made up, as far as I can tell (also note that the first editor's name is Alyssa, and that the first activity of the subject of the article was basically a 14-year-old girl working as a pro wrestler), and because even if I AGF and it's entirely truthful, it doesn't meet wikipedia notability standards. Deltopia 19:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• delete it's a pretty obvious hoax, I db's the wikiquote page. Pete.Hurd 03:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From the mouth of Alyssa Ortiz I had to create an account in order to try and get the "Alyssa Ortiz" page deleted. I don't want people knowing my personal buisness and half of the information on the page is untrue. I'm all for deleting it on the grounds that it's untrue and creepy in a "I have a stalker" way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LithiumEdge (talk • contribs) 23:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This perspective brings things dangerously close to Speedy delete criteria A10, in conjunction with the policy on BLP. I'm not sure if it directly meets the threshold, though, because the page isn't attacking or negative in tone, just generally libelous (assuming authenticiy and GF). Deltopia 09:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.