The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Altsoft Xml2PDF[edit]

Altsoft Xml2PDF (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no notability. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 23:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 23:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per WP:GNG. I don't see that this is notable above the so many other available converter programs available. It hasn't made a historical difference as a product from a company, and the essay WP:NSOFT can help with this argument. - Pmedema (talk) 22:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent references. The componentsource.com EL has a 'buy it now' link so is not an independent review. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 14:32, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.