The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No assertion of notability. I did a quick google, and the best I got was this. doesn't quite cut it, unfortunately. yandman 08:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Altsoft[edit]

Altsoft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

While the article is being created under WP guidelines (including an OTRS ticket to use the company's PR material), this is still a corporate advertisement. The company does not meet WP:CORP in any way; no indication of notability is given other than the mere existence of the entity. The ((underconstruction)) tag notwithstanding, this is a clear WP:CSD#A7, but pulling to AfD for consensus in recognition of the way the author is going about this. §FreeRangeFrog 17:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• OTRS is good; no comment about notability. Stifle (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the page named "Altsoft" has right to present in the Wikipedia. The article is informative and encyclopedic, it doesn't violate any copyright law and is not advertising and promotion of the company. Therewith the article is under construction.~~Aimonai~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aimonai (talk • contribs) 19:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC) — Aimonai (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Delete - Promotional tone, no suggestion of any notability. . . Rcawsey (talk) 13:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oho, at last the guys published an article about themselves!!! I don't see any reason for article's deletion, although I use the Altsoft's product I didn't know some of the information about them. Didn't even know that it is possible to integrate Altsoft product with Gradual Switch. cool! 86.57.147.121 (talk) 21:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.