The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as nonsense/hoax (non admin close) Beeblebrox (talk) 23:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alksdnfaokse[edit]

Alksdnfaokse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Appears to be a made-up nonsense name. Google turns up zero results. The sole reference has no mention of "Alksdnfaokse". Deli nk (talk) 22:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete - Copy of Banana bread with a nonsense name. -- OlEnglish (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: BOLLOCKS FORK. Baileypalblue (talk) 22:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - WP:HOAX, too. §FreeRangeFrog 22:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom, FreeRangeFrog. Alpha 4615 (talk) 23:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete G1 Nonsense, now tagged as such. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - There should really be a CSD for clear and present hoaxes. §FreeRangeFrog 23:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• This one is obvious nonsense, hence the G1, some others I've seen qualify as pure vandalism. I imagine the rationale is that if it's not so obvious you give the creator a chance to prove the validity. No way that's going to happen here though. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.